From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Talulah" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AW: How come Ada isn't more popular? Date: 23 Jan 2007 02:31:26 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1169548286.088284.198940@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1169531612.200010.153120@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.248.198.150 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1169548293 2251 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2007 10:31:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:31:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 ukman005.uk.landisgyr.com:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE10) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.248.198.150; posting-account=z8Bf2AwAAACTha-0EcZ9lFjw3-dKgDhx Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8415 Date: 2007-01-23T02:31:26-08:00 List-Id: Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG) wrote: > Mind you, I do not argue that there are strong reasons why some project > does not use Ada - we're talking popularity here. Popularity is the key thing surely - the chicken and egg. As a software manager in a commercial business, I employ C programmers because there are so few Ada programmers around in the UK. There are so few Ada programmers in the UK because I employ C programmers! How do you break that chain? There are many examples in marketing history of inferior products becoming the more widespread, e.g. Betamax v VHS video recorders, MSDOS v Concurrent CPM-86. I guess this is just another one of them.