From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: artifact.one@googlemail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: How come Ada isn't more popular?
Date: 22 Jan 2007 21:53:32 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1169531612.200010.153120@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.179.242.178
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1169531618 12521 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2007 05:53:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:53:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20060601 Firefox/2.0 (Ubuntu-edgy),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.179.242.178;
   posting-account=3t6ROQ0AAABpbovmj4Qol-vmGur4qb-2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8405
Date: 2007-01-22T21:53:32-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello.

I am a long time C programmer (10 years plus), having a look
at Ada for the first time. From my (inadequate) testing, it seems
that performance of average Ada code is on par with average
C code, and there's a clear advantage in runtime safety. The
GNU ada compiler makes pretty sure that there are very few
platforms without easy access to Ada, so portability should be
on at least an equal footing too.

My question is: how come Ada isn't more popular?

This isn't intended to start a flame war, I'm genuinely interested.

thanks,
MC