From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a84eaf8fb2470909,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "markww" <markww@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada generics
Date: 21 Dec 2006 06:14:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1166710494.869393.108730@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.65.64.109
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1166710501 10400 127.0.0.1 (21 Dec 2006 14:15:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
 .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.65.64.109;
   posting-account=cNKOMg0AAADT2ug8oGSYYXo8bsDvrHzw
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7972
Date: 2006-12-21T06:14:54-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi,

I'm trying to compare generics in Ada vs C++ templates and Java
generics. Is there anything Ada generics can do that C++ or Java
cannot? I read that the Ada system was safer than C++ templates. I'm
just looking for some distinctive features.

Thanks