From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ce5fb49dc74582f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Heaney" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: generic question Date: 29 Nov 2006 07:57:31 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1164815851.068545.76850@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> References: <1163959439.299036.129940@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <87mz6nnt4v.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <20061119202320.19149a2f@cube.tz.axivion.com> <4560D5BE.5060508@obry.net> <1164059458.442430.110710@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4562a51a$0$27404$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <45633396.10704@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1164815855 10285 127.0.0.1 (29 Nov 2006 15:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:57:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.162.65.129; posting-account=Zl1UPAwAAADEsUSm1PMMiDjihtBlZUi_ Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7742 Date: 2006-11-29T07:57:31-08:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > One could argue that programmers shouldn't be exporting > access types in the first place, but that would not reflect the way many > programmers use Ada. Well it certainly reflects the way I program! My use of named access types has been limited to instantiating generics and for allocating instances from a storage pool.