From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,278bf0771374076e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: george@gentoo.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada is getting spanked :(
Date: 30 Oct 2006 13:50:17 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1162245017.760239.149590@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1162052997.664967.135910@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
   <3321666.DLNnW6yRHq@linux1.krischik.com>
   <ei5g46$44r$1@news.task.gda.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.218.15.68
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1162245023 7148 127.0.0.1 (30 Oct 2006 21:50:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <ei5g46$44r$1@news.task.gda.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X;
 appLanguage) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Safari/125.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.218.15.68;
   posting-account=Rd6r_Q0AAAA6EEVQqsubWwcFg5gPo_o3
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7279
Date: 2006-10-30T13:50:17-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

jtg wrote:
> Is there any standard Ada binding to the GMP library? By "standard
> binding" I mean a binding included in gnat/gcc.

You can take a look here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132119
As you can see, this is on my list, but first I need to finish with the
transition to split gnat compilers (should be soon finally - only a few
libs left) - in Gentoo you have the ability to have multiple gnat
implementation installed side-by-side and switch them on the fly..

>>From the description it seems that the link in the last posting may be
in decent shape, however I did not look at it in detail yet.. 

George