From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,278bf0771374076e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Isaac Gouy" <igouy@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada is getting spanked :(
Date: 28 Oct 2006 21:58:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1162097906.483789.59840@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
References: <1162052997.664967.135910@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
   <3321666.DLNnW6yRHq@linux1.krischik.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.127.160
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1162097912 7634 127.0.0.1 (29 Oct 2006 04:58:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:58:32 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <3321666.DLNnW6yRHq@linux1.krischik.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060910 Epiphany/2.14 SeaMonkey/1.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.6.127.160;
   posting-account=7DGySgwAAADWW5O_600A0X4F7Tvs4mwJ
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7256
Date: 2006-10-28T21:58:26-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Martin Krischik wrote:
> cl1 wrote:
>
> > I just got wind of this site. It would seem that ada, while not at
> > the very bottom, is one of the slowest languages in this benchmark
> > competition:
> >
> > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org
>
> Looks worse then last time I looked. Seems that some language advocates
> really optimised there implementations.
>
> And there is still one test missing for Ada.
>
> Martin
> --
> mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
> Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com

The positions for the compiled languages shuffled around a bit after we
made an effort to use the same gcc compiler options on all the language
implementations that would take them.

And at least on Gentoo, after upgrading to gcc 4.1.1 I'm not that sure
which version of GNAT we should be using?