From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,67081052ea7f8429
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "REH" <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Information On How To Use The Ada Score Compiler For Windows PC
Date: 24 Aug 2006 12:19:48 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1156447188.066321.82670@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
References: <1156000379.243866.114370@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <ln8xlk9zdf.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>
   <1156030891.215284.161370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1156367120.683246.307010@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
   <1156431064.612240.119140@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <1156432975.224730.167820@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1156442004.713724.50750@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.35.35.35
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156447193 4998 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2006 19:19:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1156442004.713724.50750@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.35.35.35;
   posting-account=lnUIyw0AAACoRB2fMF2SFTIilm8F10q2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6353
Date: 2006-08-24T12:19:48-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Chris L wrote:
> REH wrote:
> >
> > I don't have any info.  We dropped them early from our trade study
> > because we keep running into compiler crashes.  They'd fixed one, and
> > we'd hit another.  They were very responsive, though, and fix each one
> > very quickly.  We were just running out of time and still had four
> > other compilers to evaluate.
>
> So, do you recommend the Score compiler for professional use and under
> what restrictions?
>
> Thank you,
> Christopher Lusardi

I don't feel I'm qualified to say one way or the other, and I do not
want to be the cause of them losing business.  I can only tell you of
my limited experience with it.  

REH