From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,20c75acdaea028c3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Usage of \ in Ada
Date: 24 Aug 2006 10:16:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1156439794.632467.297550@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
References: <1156147411.215015.31110@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <J2oGg.918063$084.842278@attbi_s22>
   <17jicmx6si17i.1wwvf6cafw7u1.dlg@40tude.net>
   <ofuGg.146612$1i1.6400@attbi_s72>
   <1thd8agjty9cr.dyp1m8yqb4xd$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1156270408.443763.15680@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <y11pyxvdre7h.iuw8mr3pau4b.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1156354284.975163.174490@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1j9zi3r2docoq$.5gnvkzmffdxu.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1156378961.270464.303590@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <6gojce.g51.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
   <ko0eva2unykm.13dmm0nr0c6wp$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156439800 16545 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2006 17:16:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:16:40 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.7.12-1.3.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
   posting-account=cw1zeQwAAABOY2vF_g6V_9cdsyY_wV9w
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6346
Date: 2006-08-24T10:16:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:37:21 +0200, Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
>
> > Adam Beneschan a =E9crit :
> >> It's probably to prevent stupid errors.  If you have a string literal
> >> with an LF in it, it's far more likely (using a fairly traditional
> >> representation of the source) that you've forgotten a closing quote
> >> than that you intended to put a linefeed in the literal.  And if the
> >> language did try to allow a line separator in a string literal (even if
> >> it were represented as something like \n in the representation)
> >
> > And of course, if you really need an LF in a character string, just use
> > Ada.Characters.Latin_1.LF ....
>
> Sure, but that is not the point.

Well, J-P's point is sort of pertinent.  The question I was trying to
answer was, what was the reason for Ada not allowing control characters
inside string literals.  And whatever reasons the authors might have
had for thinking allowing them was a bad idea, the fact is that it's
relatively easy in Ada to find another way to include such characters
in a string value, simply by using the concatenate operator and
A=2EC.L.LF or whatever, so there's no pressing need to find a way to
represent them inside string literals.  Trying to do the same thing in
C, without using the special escape sequences, is pretty painful.

                                  -- Adam