From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,67081052ea7f8429 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Information On How To Use The Ada Score Compiler For Windows PC Date: 24 Aug 2006 08:22:55 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1156432975.224730.167820@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1156000379.243866.114370@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1156030891.215284.161370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1156367120.683246.307010@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <1156431064.612240.119140@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.91.173.36 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156432980 29607 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2006 15:23:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:23:00 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1156431064.612240.119140@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.91.173.36; posting-account=lnUIyw0AAACoRB2fMF2SFTIilm8F10q2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6341 Date: 2006-08-24T08:22:55-07:00 List-Id: Chris L wrote: > REH wrote: > > Martin wrote: > > > > > > Check http://ddci.com/products_SCORE.php?t=80x86/Pentium > > > > > > Never used it though, sorry. > > > > > > Cheers > > > -- Martin > > > > I have. We recently did a trade study on Ada 95 compilers. We found > > Score to be very buggy. > > Is the data on Score useful, readable, and available? > > Thanks, > Christopher Lusardi I don't have any info. We dropped them early from our trade study because we keep running into compiler crashes. They'd fixed one, and we'd hit another. They were very responsive, though, and fix each one very quickly. We were just running out of time and still had four other compilers to evaluate. REH