From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,553a6b79b2471571 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How do you bitwise operations in Ada '83 and '95 From: Georg Bauhaus In-Reply-To: <20060720112346.C65387@docenti.ing.unipi.it> References: <9315684D-C216-4EDA-8852-0A6BD4C275B0@amado-alves.info> <44bf3301$0$10529$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <20060720112346.C65387@docenti.ing.unipi.it> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: # Message-ID: <1153398718.9119.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:31:58 +0200 NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jul 2006 14:31:34 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: b5a5b784.newsread4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=\I@iOWYNlTP\6[GEd:nl>[:ejgIfPPldTjW\KbG]kaMXliQbn6H@_EYcdR`KMC7IKWhP3YJKgE\j\i^3YIPCKQDY`J7J On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 11:29 +0200, Colin Paul Gloster wrote: > No actual implementation is required to have a datatype for Annex B > identical to a replacement of Interfaces.Unsigned_n in another > implementation. Well, yes, the Unsigned_n types are per implementation. Realistically, how is type Time is mod 2 ** 96; any more portable than Unsigned_96? The definition might express in a better way that there is no dependence on hardware.