From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,72daad0d97829ad6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "ldb" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Tasking, protected objects, Ada 95 RM Date: 19 Jul 2006 07:00:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1153317613.031115.150080@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1153235397.700369.134780@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.210.81.52 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1153317620 4570 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2006 14:00:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:00:20 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.210.81.52; posting-account=V3awPg0AAAB11Uk1Sshvlrxz0peUf-At Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5811 Date: 2006-07-19T07:00:13-07:00 List-Id: Thanks everyone of the input. And thanks for the heads-up about Pragma(Detect_Blocking). Yes, it is true that I am not calling a blocking operation from a protected object.. after carefully reading the RM95 manual and looking up a bunch of cross references, I was able to convince myself that what I am doing is perfectly acceptable... and you all appear to be in accordance with that, which is good.