From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0f6c37e3c1b712a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Hyman Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO? Date: 3 Jul 2006 15:22:14 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1151965334.709372.227600@a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> References: <1151405920.523542.137920@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151434144.2179.36.camel@localhost> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.248.208 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1151965339 1112 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2006 22:22:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:22:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.253.248.208; posting-account=lJDDWg0AAACmMd7wLM4osx8JUCDw_C_j Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5444 Date: 2006-07-03T15:22:14-07:00 List-Id: M E Leypold wrote: > Wonderful. Now tell me what rights ACT had to strip the linking > exception from most files of florist. Please do that after diffing GPL > florist against 3.15p. Florist itself grants that right. For example, I looked at . It says at the beginning, FLORIST is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. That's what AdaCore is doing - they are choosing to distribute it solely under the GPL. While the above header does grant the special linking exemption as well, it does not require that this exemption must continue to be given upon redistribution. In fact, a close reading of that heading would imply that you are not even permitted to redistribute with that exemption! That is, when the file is distributed to you from the original party, it grants you the exemption, but it says that you can only redistribute it under the GPL as published by the FSF.