From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb264cdd67c2f20f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news.mediascape.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Possibly fixed in gcc 4.1.1, but bug box -- Was: Re: A smaller
	self contained test case ...
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <1151484112.998493.14620@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
References: <05lkrrojfd.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
	 <t3k678yz5g.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
	 <16veqny46o.fsf_-_@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <4gdbbqF1ld2nsU1@individual.net>
	 <1151484112.998493.14620@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: #
Message-ID: <1151484691.24349.25.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:51:31 +0200
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 2006 10:49:39 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2c96b3cf.newsread4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=QMR<m\J7XQ`d:IG0JE`:@g:ejgIfPPlddjW\KbG]kaMhLL]:kiR8f=oYbRlME\MZ5nUUng9_FXZ=c>:=P9Ihe`Bh@Z?dZ]MOide
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5198
Date: 2006-06-28T10:49:39+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:41 -0700, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>  So, GCC 4.1 is quite useable and
> appropriate for most purposes; Robert Dewar himself confirmed so,
> verbally, during FOSDEM.

Also that they are looking forward to using the 4 series, IIRC,
as the new compilers have more optimizations.

I know that some compiler makers don't like performance comparisons
other than their own, but anyway, among the qualities of compilers
is the speed of executable code. I know about GNAT and ObjectAda on
Windows. GNAT wins, ObjectAda  is o.K.. Any other estimates for other
compilers?