From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0f6c37e3c1b712a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO?
Date: 28 Jun 2006 00:45:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1151480714.730898.137230@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
References: <1151405920.523542.137920@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
   <ugi7n3-9it.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
   <1151413996.881418.65260@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>
   <2418185.2jO2KLhFBO@linux1.krischik.com>
   <1151431127.2179.20.camel@localhost>
   <xx1wtam8j0.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
   <m2r719zu9v.fsf@grendel.local>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.189.119.153
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1151480719 17236 127.0.0.1 (28 Jun 2006 07:45:19
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:45:19 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2r719zu9v.fsf@grendel.local>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de;
 rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.189.119.153;
   posting-account=2-0LkQwAAAAQMhPSoYwlMiUmi-6lYh44
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5193
Date: 2006-06-28T00:45:14-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Simon Wright wrote:
> Since the BCs don't use the non-standard pragma License (Licence?) the
> question doesn't arise. And given this discussion they are not going
> to.

In the absence of pragma License GNAT scans the commens for magic words
which indicate the lincence used ;-) . As it is the BC will be
considered GMGPL by GNAT. But since no GNAT specific packages are used
no licence warnings are issued.

Martin