From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: gshapovalov@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other licenses related questions... Date: 24 Jun 2006 05:49:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1151153353.337673.47780@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> References: <449660f0$0$11077$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1150717184.087134.177850@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1151050924.969806.284410@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.218.15.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1151153358 18209 127.0.0.1 (24 Jun 2006 12:49:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:49:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; appLanguage) AppleWebKit/125.5.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.218.15.159; posting-account=JLj9sw0AAAAfN2BnIEmryYsYbxhqZ35_ Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4969 Date: 2006-06-24T05:49:13-07:00 List-Id: I am sorry for the repetition, but I feel I have to make it clear again.. Michael Bode wrote: > ...in an related thread there is a discussion of the license for > GtkAda. I just looked at some source files of the CVS Version > (https://libre2.adacore.com/cvsweb/GtkAda/) and they still read: > > ... > -- As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from -- > ... Exactly because of this clause still in the specs and no COPYING provided and somewhere in some file (not normally expected place) there was a statement that is is *GPL* I contacted GtkAda developers to clarify this (when I was repackaging GtkAda for Gentoo). This is the responce I got: -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Arnaud Charlet To: George Shapovalov Date: 19.5.06 10.20 George, All the packages available in libre.adacore.com are available under the pure GPL license, this includes among others GtkAda and XML/Ada. Regards, Arno ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't think he could have been any more explicit in his responce. So, it seems GtkAga and everything coming from AdaCore is pure GPL or commercial nowadays.. (closely matching the Trolltech situation at the moment AFAICS). If anybody has any further questions I strongly suggest contacting AdaCore directly and making another case to clean-up their sources.. George