From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!statler.nntpserver.com!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications
From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
In-Reply-To: <inZdg.11939$S7.8565@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
References: <mubcg.13522$fb2.853@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
	 <epcs4e.qb8.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <tHkcg.6937$kR6.484@trnddc05>
	 <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
	 <PkHcg.90575$Fs1.7198@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <To_cg.10095$S7.4017@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
	 <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <pan.2006.05.24.15.48.07.783229@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
	 <ru0dg.156184$eR6.115957@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	 <pan.2006.05.24.17.53.03.81353@linuxchip.demon.co.uk.uk.uk>
	 <2006052415345816807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <op.s92jl8t85afhvo@dogen>
	 <5H9dg.10257$S7.8193@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
	 <1319222.cHklMpk1fa@linux1.krischik.com>
	 <inZdg.11939$S7.8565@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: #
Message-ID: <1148736121.9030.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 15:22:01 +0200
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 May 2006 17:22:02 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8bd59697.newsread2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=aK<ZSQHG>mVXNWN:<mWDZPQ5U85hF6f;TjW\KbG]kaMX[NGU2GAcMGZ<?Q]IHf7[A_=0F65HQV8iV0ZTW@B@01_S
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4548
Date: 2006-05-27T17:22:02+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 14:29 +0000, robin wrote:
> "Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message
> news:1319222.cHklMpk1fa@linux1.krischik.com...
> > robin wrote:
> >
> > > "Ed Falis" <falis@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > > news:op.s92jl8t85afhvo@dogen...
> > >> On Wed, 24 May 2006 14:34:58 -0400, Gordon Sande
> > >> <g.sande@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > The urban legends ...
> > >>
> > >> In the Ariane 5 case, it wasn't ...
> > >
> > > That wasn't the case. ...
> >
> > The review was only done for the Ariane 4 rocket.
> 
> The report specifically states ...

Please, could the non-insiders stop any further short cut
exegesis of rocket history in favor of discussing readily
accessible language issues?


Georg