From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: gary.l.scott@lmco.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Bounds Check Overhead Date: 26 May 2006 07:59:43 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1148655583.421963.226740@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <4475DA61.3080001@comcast.net> <44762F55.4050106@cits1.stanford.edu> <87hd3d1472.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <3cBdg.6255$oa3.2407@trnddc08> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.91.171.36 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1148655588 27615 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2006 14:59:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:59:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.91.171.36; posting-account=C6x9RAwAAAD1MnUFUMY-M1LaucT0OnHg Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4495 comp.lang.fortran:10292 Date: 2006-05-26T07:59:43-07:00 List-Id: So should I be prevented from having the volatile attribute in common (a common place for it to be in old code)?