From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b5d24fafdd53e815 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "kevin cline" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why C for the Open Source Movement? Date: 7 May 2006 20:46:25 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1147059985.172049.204300@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> References: <1146943727.180033.286070@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.1.127.21 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1147059994 17294 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2006 03:46:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 03:46:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050225 Firefox/1.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.1.127.21; posting-account=Thx6EwwAAAAirqf96i7UdETSL0vfyj5f Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4135 Date: 2006-05-07T20:46:25-07:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Creem wrote: > zeta_no wrote: > > Hi to all, > > > > Can someone explain me the reasons why the main actors of the Open > > Source community didn't choose Ada instead of C to write the core > > elements of their systems (Linux, Hurd, FreeBSD etc...) ,,, > > All of those projects started before there was a freely available Ada > compiler. And even if there had been a compiler, Ada-83 was ill-suited for the work. The language was crippled by design to prevent certain classes of bugs. Unfortunately, this also made certain classes of applications difficult to develop. Nor does Ada's verbosity seem to appeal to the majority of programmers motivated to do public-domain work.