From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bc7c6cdb81b2e46 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Anh Vo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Missing Search (..) Operation From Ada.Directories Date: 4 May 2006 12:38:52 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1146771532.621760.241220@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> References: <1146705264.736575.281650@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.225.225.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1146771537 6447 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2006 19:38:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 19:38:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.225.225.99; posting-account=JVr7Xg0AAAAI3MbuARxMmvWLmA7qdJMx Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4075 Date: 2006-05-04T12:38:52-07:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Anh Vo" wrote in message > news:1146705264.736575.281650@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > > Operation Search (...) defined in A.16 paragraph 26/2 of the ARM 2005 > > is missing from GNAT under gcc-4.1.x (gcc-4.1-20060428) and gcc-4.2 > > Stage 3 (gcc-4.2-20060429). The specification of this operation is > > copied and shown here for convenience. > > > > procedure Search ( > > Directory : in String; > > Pattern : in String; > > Filter : in Filter_Type := (others => True); > > Process : not null access procedure ( > > Directory_Entry : in Directory_Entry_Type)); > > > > Could any one know why? Thanks in advance for your insight. > > Probably because that was a relatively last-minute insertion into the > package (it was added in February 2005), and as that was the only > substantive change made in the last couple of years, it may have been > overlooked. (It was missing from the Janus/Ada package until 10 seconds ago > :-), so they're not the only ones to have missed it.) Thanks for your info. In addition, I am glad that Janus/Ada has it now. I hope that AdaCore/GNAT will follow suit. AV