From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25b9eb5c3a89bced
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Chapman" <rod.chapman@praxis-his.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
Date: 24 Apr 2006 01:13:09 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1145866389.652860.320940@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1145852356.559455.222600@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.205.167.130
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145866395 5121 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2006 08:13:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB;
 rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.205.167.130;
   posting-account=EhC47gwAAABJYiJ7JUJjwDyYMTWH1OKq
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3914
Date: 2006-04-24T01:13:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ananth the Boss wrote:
> can any one give some more justifications for telling "ADA is safe" thanks
> in advance

Have you considered the SPARK Ada subset?  Read chapters 1-3 of the
SPARK
textbook - that will give you a very good idea of the issues involved
in the design
of high-integrity languages.
 - Rod, SPARK Team, Praxis