From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25b9eb5c3a89bced,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ananth the Boss" <anboss@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: where exactly c++,c fail and Ada gets thru'
Date: 23 Apr 2006 21:19:16 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1145852356.559455.222600@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.200.153.7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145852361 9088 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2006 04:19:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:19:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 FunWebProducts),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ag0.vssc.org:8000 (Squid/2.4.STABLE6)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.200.153.7;
   posting-account=OvrGOQwAAACBMesH2Qn9O80QIhYyyouK
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3909
Date: 2006-04-23T21:19:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

we are developing safety critical software.my seniors say that c and
c++ are not suitable for safety critical software development and ada
is very much safe.NASA aslo uses Ada.at what point c++ or c turns to be
not suitable for devleloping flight software. i may be wrong also. can
any one give some more justifications for telling "ADA is safe" thanks
in advance