From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,cfc5097715e8ed04,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Ananth the Boss" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: n versioning is there any other better approach Date: 20 Apr 2006 23:05:06 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1145599506.289672.274530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.200.153.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145599514 4813 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2006 06:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:05:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ag0.vssc.org:8000 (Squid/2.4.STABLE6) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.200.153.7; posting-account=OvrGOQwAAACBMesH2Qn9O80QIhYyyouK Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3884 Date: 2006-04-20T23:05:06-07:00 List-Id: we are developing safety critical flight software by n version approach.also we validate performance of flight software by comparing results of software with that of another version(autonomous).how can this be effective.ther may b a chance that autonomous may b wrong.since 'n' times the same task of development has 2 b carried out time and labor involved is wasted in this strategy.