From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,83146ab172572dc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Le" <snelson1@llnl.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Linux kernel bindings - at least sockets?
Date: 28 Mar 2006 10:38:00 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1143571080.055561.266940@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
References: <1143496814.083145.207360@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <m364ly7892.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.115.35.70
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1143571085 20848 127.0.0.1 (28 Mar 2006 18:38:05
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m364ly7892.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.115.35.70;
   posting-account=KkHgpQ0AAACJ6vo83UckeWojsCAJd4eu
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3674
Date: 2006-03-28T10:38:00-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thanks Mark. I initially rejected florist because I, probably
erroneously, saw a difference between the wrapping of VxWorks I/F in
our compiler vendors implementation and the Posix I/F in florist. Now
that I have the RFC, thanks to Jeffrey, I will be able to compare the
I/Fs and make a, hopefully, more judicious selection based on our new
target's sockets I/Fs.