From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9a965e968910d2a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Anh Vo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Complete Rationale for Ada 2005 available on AdaIC Date: 3 Mar 2006 10:28:25 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1141410504.952605.174500@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <3J6Nf.46584$d5.203001@newsb.telia.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.225.225.28 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141410512 10135 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2006 18:28:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:28:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.225.225.28; posting-account=JVr7Xg0AAAAI3MbuARxMmvWLmA7qdJMx Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3257 Date: 2006-03-03T10:28:25-08:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Bj=F6rn Persson" wrote in message > news:3J6Nf.46584$d5.203001@newsb.telia.net... > > Randy Brukardt wrote: > > > The ARA is proud to announce that the complete Ada 2005 Rationale is = now > > > available on its website at > http://www.adaic.com/standards/rationale05.html. > > > > It looks like a really good resource. Can we help making it even better > > by reporting errors? > > > > In Rat-1-3-1.html, on the line "type DT3 is new T1 and Int1 and Int2 > > with ...", the "and"s aren't bold. > > Doesn't having a few typos make it more fun?? ;-) > > I've fixed this one in the HTML version (I only change the PDFs when John > makes new ones, which is a lot less often); hopefully there won't be one = of > these every day... I just checked the pdf that I downloaded way back. They have been bolded as intended. AV