From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab132517972acd5f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Heaney" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: accessing record element (question to the pros) Date: 28 Feb 2006 12:02:44 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1141156964.771409.28180@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> References: <1704363.KA6FmlD55X@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.162 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141156970 10276 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2006 20:02:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:02:50 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1704363.KA6FmlD55X@linux1.krischik.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.162.65.162; posting-account=Zl1UPAwAAADEsUSm1PMMiDjihtBlZUi_ Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3209 Date: 2006-02-28T12:02:44-08:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > And if you still want to do it: The newest GNAT has pragma Unchecked_Union. > You find a description in the texts above. Yes, but realize that that pragma is now officially part of Ada 2005. It's true the GNAT has it, but I don't think even GNAT supports what's described in RM05. (But I could be wrong. All compilers differ in how much of Ada 2005 they support today.)