From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,136c120daac2a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Rolf" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: tasksing and TCP sockets Date: 31 Jan 2006 15:03:18 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1138748598.084128.58760@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.152.8.65 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1138748603 19236 127.0.0.1 (31 Jan 2006 23:03:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:03:23 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.152.8.65; posting-account=X6JcNAwAAACCYFUClJvh1OjD0lgttvkm Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2729 Date: 2006-01-31T15:03:18-08:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote: > But it seems to me that if the object is to use TCP to emulate hardware, > one should design for that hardware and do whatever is needed with UDP or > TCP to make the best emulation. Is the intended hardware going to be > polled or generate interrupts or Windows messages or what? The real sensor hardware will be directly connected to the I/O pins of the mcu. I think that counts as polling. The application code simply reads variables from the h/w abstraction layer.