From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7bd68c129ac31eea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Craig Carey " Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Debugger Date: 13 Jan 2006 17:12:01 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1137201121.293833.267060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1136476040.024617.53280@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <483c8$43bd6de1$3ea6010b$22967@news.versatel.net> <1136813737.549027.323090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1136821526.945692.106370@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.109.235.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1137201126 3017 127.0.0.1 (14 Jan 2006 01:12:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:12:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1136821526.945692.106370@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.109.235.124; posting-account=VAk6zg0AAAAB8m7bE8j11Y9JsY1KL2hL Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2493 Date: 2006-01-13T17:12:01-08:00 List-Id: What could be done it done is to write a task that runs in parallel that accepts commands for Gdb via TCP. >>From what I saw of Gdb, it won't stop or catch exceptions when attaching has been done. Maybe workarounds are needed. --- This C community is starting to look like that ADA: that has most vendors, especially including GNAT and IBM, put all their core discussions on substantive improvements to ADA, in a the single zip file of the chief censor (eg. a censor since censoring reasoning for censoring). | Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ | From: John Nagle - Find messages by this author | Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:24:50 CST | Subject: Re: why no new types from typedef? | | If you want a new type, you can write | | class A: public B {}; | | Admittedly you can't subclass the built-in types, something | Java and Smalltalk allow but C++ does not. | | John Nagle | Animats | | Tinct wrote: | | > In Pascal/ADA, "TYPE B is A" generates a new type B, the behavior | > of A and B are the identical. But B is not A. That is, ... *| In c++, "typedef A B" means that B is a replacer/abbreviation of A. *| No new type B is generated! It seems that Java or Python could be a remedy. Craig Carey