From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 108717,a7c8692cac750b5e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid115aec,gidf43e6,gid108717,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-08!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: CTips <ctips@bestweb.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng,comp.programming
Subject: Re: 10 rules for benchmarking (was Re: Teaching new tricks to an
   old dog (C++ -->Ada))
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:36:12 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <1136h6a12qv8282@corp.supernews.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02>
 <d0dkq6$781$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <112rs0bdr2aftdf@corp.supernews.com>
 <1inxxr988rxgg$.1w9dedak41k89.dlg@40tude.net>
 <112s1r0rf0o8nca@corp.supernews.com> <d0l2gq$egt$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <112sonip5v4dca6@corp.supernews.com>
 <E1vXd.352556$w62.20389@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <112t3de6fu04f38@corp.supernews.com>
 <1110396477.596174.285520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <112vb2t8eonuhed@corp.supernews.com>
 <1110422108.925127.54110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
 <11329cb96h2p19f@corp.supernews.com> <c92s0d.vgk.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <113394jjvppao64@corp.supernews.com> <uk6oeaua9.fsf@obry.org>
 <1133s3qnmqmbjfb@corp.supernews.com>
 <4232a9f7$0$26552$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <11369p5jrcc6835@corp.supernews.com> <d0vd02$1mc$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <d0vd02$1mc$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9253 comp.realtime:1385
 comp.software-eng:4948 comp.programming:17880
Date: 2005-03-12T14:36:12-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Martin Dowie wrote:

> CTips wrote:
> 
>> BTW: I was looking around - I couldn't find an Ada equivalent to the 
>> ISO C clock() routine. What is it? I can't believe that the Ada 
>> standard community would have been *that* oblivious to performance 
>> that they wouldn't put a performance measuring routine in the core 
>> specification.
> 
> 
> See http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/AIs/AI-00307.TXT?rev=1.13 
> for the Ada2005 standard package which also detects execution time 
> overruns.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- Martin

So it still isn't in the standard...