From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 10 Dec 92 16:22:24 GMT
From: pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!prijat!guinness.cs.uofs.edu!beidler@gate
ch.edu  (Jack Beidler)
Subject: Re: C++ vs. Ada -- Is Ada loosing?
Message-ID: <11330@prijat.cs.uofs.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I've enjoyed reading all the postings on why Ada is loosing to C++.
Practically all of the posting are missing the "real" reason.  It has
to do with economic considerations (read my company wants to make
more money).  Think of it this way:  I'm a governement software
contractor.  If I build a perfect, or at least a close to perfect 
system, I make all my money (read profit) by the time I deliver 
the system.  However, if I build a buggy system with unreadable 
source code, I make money (again read profit) over the entire life 
of the software.  Since I can build buggier unreadable software in 
C and C++, naturally I want to use C and C++ so I can make more 
money over a longer period of time.
-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  John (Jack) Beidler				                   |
|  Prof. of Computer Science Internet: BEIDLER@JAGUAR.UOFS.EDU     |
|  University of Scranton              beidler@guinness.cs.uofs.edu|
|  Scranton, PA 18510	      Bitnet : BEIDLER@SCRANTON            |
|                                                                  |
|          Phone: (717) 941-7446	 FAX:   (717) 941-4250     |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+