From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MSGID_YAHOO
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c50f57c0c29b391b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!cox.net!news-xfer.cox.net!p01!fed1read03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-Id: <1131064.rs72P29t4t@yahoo.com>
From: alex goldman <hello@spamm.er>
Subject: memory management
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:57:18 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.107.102.129
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: fed1read03 1117069094 68.107.102.129 (Wed, 25 May 2005 20:58:14 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:58:14 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11154
Date: 2005-05-25T17:57:18-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

As I understood from reading the Ada tutorial for C/C++ programmers,
"access" is essentially like C++ smart pointer, except that you don't need
to do anything to dereference it.

How will the following work:

Record A contains "access" to record B; 
record B contains "access" to record A.

If I create an instance of one of them with "new", will it be destroyed when
"access" to it goes out of scope?