From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,955c0602964740f8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Tom" <almut.maurer@planet-interkom.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Buffers or POs?
Date: 17 Oct 2005 11:23:12 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1129573392.886254.115610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.246.135.205
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1129573398 7001 127.0.0.1 (17 Oct 2005 18:23:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
 Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.246.135.205;
   posting-account=U8t-fw0AAADTy8FY9sX4Qp4tpSCmG1Dl
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5753
Date: 2005-10-17T11:23:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have the problem that the OS provides services for buffers which are
similar to Protected Objects. What is better to use in terms of
performance the provided OS services or a self-implemented buffer
utilising Protected Objects.