From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19140af19dfa6e01 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-11 08:16:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Krischik Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 0Y plans for garbage collection? Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:09:48 +0200 Organization: AdaCL Message-ID: <1127954.kcBZz6amlf@linux1.krischik.com> References: Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1063293326 05 4555 Ta0PVLXSTdA3J9 030911 15:15:26 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de X-ID: S9FvgwZfgeK5nxR5A+ZCEcX8a9+kDSsardld5u-2pF7ibshhm3G80U User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42383 Date: 2003-09-11T17:09:48+02:00 List-Id: olehjalmar kristensen - Sun Microsystems - Trondheim Norway wrote: > I still think the way it was done in Modula-3 gives you the best of > both worlds. If you want garbage collection, you allocate from a > different pool. If you don't want it you don't use it, and there is no > overhead. Well, you can have this allready at least with GNAT. See http://www.ada.krischik.com for details. With Regards Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com