From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e26dfa741e64e5f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: wojtek@power.com.pl
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition is now available
Date: 19 Sep 2005 17:06:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1127174799.643051.201710@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
References: <432919be$0$10539$4d4eb98e@read.news.fr.uu.net>
   <m3acieu4yp.fsf@rr.trudgett>
   <m3mzmdh0jx.fsf@rr.trudgett>
   <qpI2$Z6S+IKj@eisner.encompasserve.org>
   <1126868191.519850.18060@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1127173775.245815.6580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.40.134.170
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1127174804 19484 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2005 00:06:44
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:06:44 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1127173775.245815.6580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.40.134.170;
   posting-account=KrVmowoAAADVnx8YZs7PBEa3vuGcpn5w
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4924
Date: 2005-09-19T17:06:39-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I wrote:

> It exists and I believe it will continue to exist. FSF is the copyright
> holder, so if the "Modified" clause were removed from FSF tree, AdaCore
> would be unable to provide the runtime sources to its customers under
> GMGPL anymore, either.

On second thought, the above is b/s. AdaCore can fork.

Maybe it would make sense to ask FSF about the future of the "Modified"
clause for GNAT runtime?

Regards,
Wojtek