From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0d427d5f4af20f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "REH" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: generics in Ada 83 Date: 13 Sep 2005 09:30:46 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1126629046.328151.40970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1126617980.932226.320710@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4326d73a$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.91.173.42 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1126629052 20227 127.0.0.1 (13 Sep 2005 16:30:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:30:52 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4326d73a$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.91.173.42; posting-account=lnUIyw0AAACoRB2fMF2SFTIilm8F10q2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4614 Date: 2005-09-13T09:30:46-07:00 List-Id: Martin Dowie wrote: > REH wrote: > > Is there a way to define a default for the with'd procedure in the > > following example in Ada 83: > > > > generic > > type X is private; > > with procedure Y(Z : in X); > > package Foo; > > > > I want to define a default for Y, but how can I without knowing X? > > > > I have a generic package that has several with'd procedures, but > > depending on what services the package provides are use, only a few of > > the procedures may need to be defined. I'd like to just default the > > unused ones to stubs. > > Same as Ada95: > > generic > type X is private; > with procedure Y (Z : X) is <>; > package Foo is > end Foo; > > Or do you mean you want the compiler to magically insert a 'null' procedure > if there isn't a matching procedure Y for whatever type X happens to be? If > that's the case you can't do that. There has to be some procedure (even one > that's only 'begin null end;') for each type. > > Cheers > > -- Martin defining it with a box won't work. There would have to a procedure already defined. What I want is something like: generic type X is private; with procedure Y(Z : in X) is P; package Foo but of course P must already take into account X. With '95 I think I could just with a generic package containing the stubs, but I can figure out a way in '83. Thanks.