From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,80eb73f0b0257a79 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Ludovic Brenta" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Recompiling? Date: 1 Sep 2005 04:39:38 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1125574778.289861.72390@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> References: <1125324015.247179.276030@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1125329216.771128.216930@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1545034.AJ13TFrFfp@linux1.krischik.com> <87slwq2bym.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1125568467.060707.160480@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.190.145.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1125574783 8051 127.0.0.1 (1 Sep 2005 11:39:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:39:43 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1125568467.060707.160480@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; fr-FR; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040116,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.190.145.10; posting-account=ZjNXewwAAADyBPkwI57_UcX8yKfXWOss Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4363 Date: 2005-09-01T04:39:38-07:00 List-Id: rolf.ebert_nospam_@gmx.net a =E9crit : > > Are you trying to say that ASIS and GLADE work well with GCC 3.4.2? > > At least ASIS (gnat-asis.sourceforge.net) works well with gcc-3.4.x. > > > Any supporting evidence? > > I successfully used gnatelim, which is part of ASIS. AdaBrowse is a > more complex ASIS application and works well, too. > > Rolf Thanks. I'll change the system Ada compiler for Etch, then. It seems that gnat-3.4 is the best candidate, but unfortunately it would be at odds with the system C and C++ compilers, meaning that it would not be possible to mix Ada and C++ in the same program. If I choose gnat-4.0 as the system Ada compiler, C++ works but ASIS breaks, right? Thoughts? Note that I will start the transition only after Etch completes its glibc, g++, X.org, GNOME and KDE transitions, because of [1]. Note also that the GNAT transition will take time as all packages will need to be recompiled. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg00014.html --=20 Ludovic Brenta.