From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,80eb73f0b0257a79 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Ludovic Brenta" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: PolyORB, GCC, and Debian (was Re: Recompiling?) Date: 31 Aug 2005 01:25:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1125476713.554815.176610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1125324015.247179.276030@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1125329216.771128.216930@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1125406711.923201.84470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1125473262.338445.259310@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1125476543.144394.107630@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.190.145.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1125476719 22625 127.0.0.1 (31 Aug 2005 08:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:25:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1125476543.144394.107630@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; fr-FR; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040116,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SEVPXS01 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.190.145.10; posting-account=ZjNXewwAAADyBPkwI57_UcX8yKfXWOss Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4328 Date: 2005-08-31T01:25:13-07:00 List-Id: (posted on behalf of Vadim Godunko) Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Vadim Godunko writes: > >>Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> >>> Also, PolyORB might replace >>> GLADE; you'd want to coordinate with the developers of PolyORB. > > > Are you the Vadim Gudunko who is one of the authors of PolyORB? Yes ;) > Is there a particular reason why you > mailed me privately rather than posting to comp.lang.ada? I can't have write access to CLA :( > May I send > your post myself? > Yes, of course. > > This is bad news, but it seems that PolyORB 1.2r can be compiled with > GNAT Pro 3.16a1, so perhaps 3.15p may be able to compile it as well, > with some patching. > Current stable version of PolyORB is 1.3a. I think AdaCore release 1.3r (publicy available version) in near future. This version have many code cleanup and remove many GNAT 3.15p workarounds. Thus it require GNAT Pro 5 or GCC 3.4. > Note that the reason why I didn't package PolyORB is that it is a > generic middleware; I felt that I had to provide either all > personalities, or none at all. Providing no personality was easier :) I think the more right way is provide only stable personalities, for now (PolyORB 1.3): - application: CORBA MOMA - protocol: GIOP SOAP - services: Event IR Naming Notification Time The DSA personality still unstable up to 1.4. More whan, it require synchronization between it support inside GNAT compiler, GLADE's gnatdist and PolyORB. :( This is too complex task for provide it outside of AdaCore products. :( -- Vadim Godunko