From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3f460aaba1863e2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Lucretia" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Private primitive operations available to entire package hierarchy. Can it be done? Date: 20 Jul 2005 11:14:36 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1121883276.400592.326630@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: <1120752411.808598.292980@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1121269243.013754.57720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.74.199.42 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1121883282 3708 127.0.0.1 (20 Jul 2005 18:14:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:14:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.74.199.42; posting-account=G-J9fgwAAADgpzBiEyy5tO4f8MX5fbpw Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3708 Date: 2005-07-20T11:14:36-07:00 List-Id: Yeah thanks. Hmmm, I want to keep the lib Ada95 currently as I really want the library to be usable with any Ada95 compiler. But if needs must, then I'll have to shift it to Ada 200Y and screw compatability for a while. I'd also like to ask about style from you potential users of wxAda ;-D I currently have a library where you have instances and these are not allocated with new (like GtkAda). So, I've found that the use of aliased is required in a fair few places. I'm wondering whether it would be better to follow the GtkAda style and allocate the objects using allocators. What do you lot think? Also, I use the following: New_Window(My_Window, ...); New_Frame(My_Frame, ...); New_Button(My_Button, ...); etc. Would you potential users prefer overloading? a la: Create(My_Window, ...); Create(My_Frame, ...); Create(My_Button, ...); etc. Thanks, Luke.