From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "MMM" <terekhov@emc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger.
Date: 12 Jul 2005 12:42:03 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1121197323.001169.250300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <42cb8d21$0$22761$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
   <ldco4pwrxop4$.1py0a7isiagea.dlg@40tude.net>
   <z--dnRI60_7j_lHfRVn-qw@megapath.net>
   <tyi72ga8ch55$.3tea03tbwrtx.dlg@40tude.net>
   <42cd064c$0$10817$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
   <k62rlp2n1ls3.1cnwufmnuit7v.dlg@40tude.net>
   <42cda8c4$0$22780$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
   <1u3hh2597i4ne$.1ryetugksbmus.dlg@40tude.net>
   <uslyp8mmb.fsf@earthlink.net>
   <1121093807.949660.274060@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1121124248.600055.292320@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1121137531.752285.44280@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <946e7$42d3c64d$4995421$28449@ALLTEL.NET>
   <1121179909.262566.192270@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <1121182524.007719.77090@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1121193651.532277.179550@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1121195560.962713.217640@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 168.159.190.36
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1121197329 21560 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2005 19:42:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1121195560.962713.217640@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=168.159.190.36;
   posting-account=0PrGnQwAAAAhG4fw_pPdaColajHpyOJW
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12021
Date: 2005-07-12T12:42:03-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> MMM wrote:
> > I don't think that "Sorted" vs. "Ordered" brings much confusion. What
> > is confusing is that such a specialized cases as "Ordered_Maps" and
> > "Ordered_Sets" has been put as a foundation of the standard library.
>
> It can't be that confusing, since that's already the case for C++.
Read it again, both my statement and the STL documentation. "Sorted
Associative Container" is a refinment of the plain vanilla "Associative
Container" that has no order.

>
> > Comparing sorted vs. hashed is like apples vs. oranges.
>
> A general-purpose container library needs both.  That's why hashed
> containers are being added to the C++ standard library.
It looks like you are not reading the message you are replying to.