From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitriy Anisimkov" <anisimkov@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger.
Date: 10 Jul 2005 19:24:29 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1121048669.574541.170320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1120474891.635131.216700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120575076.876798.108220@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120583470.429264.325450@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120586558.930583.79880@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120590526.790939.236390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120591595.158965.50780@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120592684.622723.174350@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120593983.215972.308010@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120615856.997416.158870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <qMednb705_KZw1HfRVn-3w@megapath.net>
   <1120707674.230510.280700@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <CIadnbEyqbna4lDfRVn-tA@megapath.net>
   <1120790099.587120.319610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <m2pstsy04e.fsf@grendel.local>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.89.131.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1121048675 14592 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2005 02:24:35
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2pstsy04e.fsf@grendel.local>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.89.131.48;
   posting-account=t4CEmgwAAAA8dL2naG2k3iz_rN__dZy3
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11990
Date: 2005-07-10T19:24:29-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

<< *You* can if you want to but *I* might say to myself, "This is a
TCP-based stream, why should I double-check what the transport layer
is doing anyway?" >>

The transport layer is protected enought. I'm talking about protection
of the reader side from errors on the writers side. So the errors (or
malicious intent) on the sender would not cause broken memory on the
reader side.