From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitriy Anisimkov" <anisimkov@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger.
Date: 5 Jul 2005 12:44:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1120592684.622723.174350@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <1120474891.635131.216700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120575076.876798.108220@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120583470.429264.325450@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120586558.930583.79880@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120590526.790939.236390@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1120591595.158965.50780@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.162.49.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1120592690 30759 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2005 19:44:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:44:50 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1120591595.158965.50780@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.162.49.9;
   posting-account=t4CEmgwAAAA8dL2naG2k3iz_rN__dZy3
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11872
Date: 2005-07-05T12:44:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> I prefer to reach safety by the 1st method. It is not a problem for
> me to reach safety.

<< Then what are we arguing about? >>

About new Ada standard. I did try to connect to AI302 discussion, but
it was closed.

<<As the Irish say, "Never scald your lips with another man's
porridge.">>

Safety is not a matter of taste, it is a matter of software quality.
Ada without safety is not better then C++.