From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2650880fba54b9e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Thorsten" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interrupt handler seems not to be called in GNAT 3.15p Date: 16 Jun 2005 00:38:56 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1118907535.965600.202910@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1118849941.554713.60100@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.226.123.200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1118907541 8955 127.0.0.1 (16 Jun 2005 07:39:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:39:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.226.123.200; posting-account=jGHaLA0AAAANZvivCTObYBZ3awmy43dc Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11403 Date: 2005-06-16T00:38:56-07:00 List-Id: Hi David! > Did you use the pragma Unreserved_all_Interrupts? Yes, it is just in the first line of the specification of SIGNAL_HANDLER. > See the discussion of that Pragma un the GNAT Reference Manual There it says that, after using pragma UNRESERVE_ALL_INTERRUPTS, my program shall be able to handle this signal. I also took a look at a-intnam.ads, where all interrupts, that may be handled by an application, are defined with symbolic names. There is no hint whatsoever why the application should not be able to handle SIGSEGV. Regards, Thorsten