From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,72340e997bfd5289 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "James E. Hopper" Subject: Re: array size Date: 1999/12/11 Message-ID: <111219991626304637%hopperj@macconnect.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 559504917 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <101219991605504828%hopperj@macconnect.com> <3851d15b_1@news1.prserv.net> <82to3s$ng7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: YA-NewsWatcher/4.2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert, i am confused. whey would Preset_Array_Type_Size : constant := 6 * Frequency_Type'Size; be illegal in this context? thanks jim ------------ In article <82to3s$ng7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: > > Always do this for composite types: > > > > Preset_Array_Type_Size : constant := 6 * > Frequency_Type'Size; > > for Preset_Array_Type'Size use Preset_Array_Type_Size; > > > This is incomprehensible advice, these are obviously equivalent. > Both will of course be illegal if Frequency_Type'Size is not > static ... Matthew what are you trying to say here?