From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Jerry Coffin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: 23 Mar 2005 17:50:33 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1111629033.627640.216540@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <1110284070.410136.205090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <1111607633.301232.62490@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1111609026.080271.186990@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1111609707.294612.108390@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.236.235.120 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1111629038 32706 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2005 01:50:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:50:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=165.236.235.120; posting-account=mZiOqwwAAAC5YZsJDHJLeReHGPXV5ENp Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9861 comp.lang.c++:46957 Date: 2005-03-23T17:50:33-08:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > "Jerry Coffin" writes: > > > In addition, one of the major arguments the Ada fans have used here > > is that Ada's strings are built-in, NOT added as a class like in > > C++. > > *Some* Ada fans have used that argument, but I'm an Ada fan, and I > don't agree with it. I happen to think that (other things being > equal) it's better to put functionality into libraries than to build > them into the syntax and semantics of the language. You're right. I did not intend to put words in your mouth (or anybody else's for that matter). What I said was wrong, and I apologize. -- Later, Jerry. The universe is a figment of its own imagination.