From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8de7eedad50552f1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Isaac Gouy" <igouy@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada bench : word frequency
Date: 23 Mar 2005 13:26:34 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1111613194.164413.310450@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References: <ibydnfDp2dhXIdzfRVn-oQ@comcast.com>
   <eQj0e.2549$s31.2022@reader1.news.jippii.net>
   <mailman.59.1111610391.23655.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.151.243
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1111613198 7170 127.0.0.1 (23 Mar 2005 21:26:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.59.1111610391.23655.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.65.151.243;
   posting-account=7DGySgwAAADWW5O_600A0X4F7Tvs4mwJ
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9834
Date: 2005-03-23T13:26:34-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Marius Amado Alves wrote:
> Here's a shot at the word frequency benchmark. By my calculations, it

> is as fast as the GCC C benchmark. I did not compare the output with
> the reference output. A line-by-line comparison requires a criterion
> for words with the same frequency, which AFAICT is not documented.

"print each word and word frequency, in descending order by frequency
and descending alphabetic order by word"

http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=wordfreq&lang=all&sort=fullcpu

> Also, my current concept of word separator does not include
punctuation
> marks. Again, I could not find a reference definition.

Hmmm and yet there are 20 programs accepted as correct.