From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Jerry Coffin" <jcoffin@taeus.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
Date: 21 Mar 2005 08:54:36 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1111424076.416236.204890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
References: <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org>
   <19167262.fkuVsrGd7i@linux1.krischik.com>
   <d126i9$kb0$1@panix2.panix.com>
   <wccpsy3awzw.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <d14s34$n90$1@panix1.panix.com>
   <wcc4qfdoqzd.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <M6C%d.49$FN4.45@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.236.235.120
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1111424081 31126 127.0.0.1 (21 Mar 2005 16:54:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:54:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=165.236.235.120;
   posting-account=mZiOqwwAAAC5YZsJDHJLeReHGPXV5ENp
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9681 comp.lang.c++:46573
 comp.realtime:1569 comp.software-eng:5169
Date: 2005-03-21T08:54:36-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

adaworks@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> "Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote in message
> news:wcc4qfdoqzd.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com...
> >
> > ...but of course there's a lot of market pressure to produce
> > standard-conforming compilers, for those languages that have
> > official standards (Ada, C, C++, Fortran, Cobol, etc).
> >
> Not Eiffel?

TTBOMK, Eiffel doesn't have an official standard. If there was an ISO
standard, it would naturally fall under JTC1/SC22, but the ISO
JTC1/SC22 web site: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/, doesn't mention
Eiffel anywhere.

Searching for Eiffel on the ANSI, ECMA and IEEE web sites fails to turn
up anything positive either -- ANSI and ECMA come up completely dry and
while IEEE cites a number of papers on Eiffel, none that I could find
looked like an official standard.

--
    Later,
    Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.