From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Chad  R. Meiners" <chad.rmeiners@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
Date: 17 Mar 2005 12:48:58 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1111092538.486127.191300@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1110390097.532139.43430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <422f3808$0$30165$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
   <1110409958.685759.249420@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <15SdnYvJ0_x3Vq3fRVn-3Q@megapath.net>
   <1110522060.091940.178510@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <uekemd5ek.fsf@obry.org>
   <1110556346.841594.212520@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <4952804.Myubg7stsI@linux1.krischik.com>
   <1110739276.774946.103020@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <RrOdnSjjws4niKvfRVn-qQ@megapath.net>
   <1110858931.523773.124170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <w86dnf6cMfy4HKvfRVn-uQ@megapath.net>
   <1110895220.422372.189820@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
   <g9OdnSGx_MIqyarfRVn-1g@megapath.net>
   <1111015648.669832.140620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
   <JMmdnXQOBLrpYKXfRVn-2w@megapath.net>
   <1111085060.475613.176310@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.167.137.13
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1111092544 11173 127.0.0.1 (17 Mar 2005 20:49:04
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1111085060.475613.176310@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.167.137.13;
   posting-account=paoWPg0AAABe-C1bfTlsEbfoc5yNqKFn
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9561 comp.lang.c++:46199
 comp.realtime:1554 comp.software-eng:5139
Date: 2005-03-17T12:48:58-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> The question is the degree to which that situation holds here. Thus
> far, you've provided essentially nothing in the way of independent
> corroboration of any of your statements at all.

So how does one provide independent corroboration over usenet?  If such
a method exists, is the method's cost reasonable?  Is there an ISO
standardize method?