From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Jerry Coffin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) Date: 11 Mar 2005 22:19:07 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1110608347.558340.28230@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <42303F7D.9080704@mailinator.com> <1110527549.194857.300000@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1110560573.472309.14810@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.236.235.106 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1110608352 22294 127.0.0.1 (12 Mar 2005 06:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:19:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=165.236.235.106; posting-account=mZiOqwwAAAC5YZsJDHJLeReHGPXV5ENp Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9199 comp.lang.c++:45267 comp.realtime:1335 comp.software-eng:4902 Date: 2005-03-11T22:19:07-08:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: [ ... ] > > If you follow-up the reading with some real use, it beats reading > > alone by a wide margin, at least IME. > > But I agree with that! Your reputation as disagreeable is ruined. > ;-) Pardon my being blunt, but Damn! The one thing I was good at is ruined! > On the other hand, if you do "real use" by itself, you're liable to > fall into the trap of thinking that "what my compiler happens to do" > is equal to "the language definition". This, unfortunately, is all too true. -- Later, Jerry. The universe is a figment of its own imagination.