From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a392f49ebae6958,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: britt@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada 2005 & IEEE 754r ? Date: 2 Feb 2005 07:59:07 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <1107359947.724262.52490@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.175.225.22 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1107359952 4130 127.0.0.1 (2 Feb 2005 15:59:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:59:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.175.225.22; posting-account=4HFLwgwAAADjxPgn7Crj2tyfsiOytT4L Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8132 Date: 2005-02-02T07:59:07-08:00 List-Id: Is anyone involved with the Ada 2005 revision also tracking the proposed changed to IEEE-STD-754 (the binary floating point arithmetic standard)? I'm asking because the draft of 754r cites several languages (C99, Java,C Fortran, PL/1, COBOL) in its rationale but it doesn't mention Ada anywhere. The revised standard defines new decimal arithmetic types and it would be a bad thing if they are somehow incompatable with decimal types in Ada. I don't know enough to evaluate this myself so I'm hoping someone else can look at this and see if there are any potential conflicts. See http://754r.ucbtest.org/drafts/754r.pdf and http://754r.ucbtest.org/ for more information. Britt