From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc7bad83fb245cb3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: falis@ma.aonix.com (Ed Falis)
Subject: Re: Binding a type to a union.
Date: 1999/11/25
Message-ID: <1103_943541468@DZOG-CHEN>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 552941850
Sender: news@sd.aonix.com (USENET News Admin @flash)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 192.157.137.145
References: <OF1AE825B1.88FF8CF8-ON88256832.005C894B@ray.ca>
 <383ae9f8_3@news1.prserv.net> <81f3qe$jln$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <1999Nov23.215123.1@eisner> <81ignc$gb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <1999Nov25.091201.1@eisner>
Organization: Aonix, San Diego, CA, USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:12:01 GMT, kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) wrote:

> > 
> > No one said this was a standard pragma, it is not! All I said
> > was that it was not GNAT specific. Look it up in the Aonix
> > documentation, or the GNAT documentation, or the Greenhills
> > documentation etc. The GNAT implementation is slightly more
> > restrictive than the Intermetrics one I believe.
> 
> It must be a _lot_ more _documented_, as I find no reference in the
> Aonix Annex M section on Implementation-define pragmas (page 1-3
> of UD/UG/A0000-05625/001, dated Mar97, the most recent version
> distributed by Aonix to subscription customers).
> 
> Larry Kilgallen

Thanks for pointing out the error in Annex M - I'll file a documentation problem
report.

Unchecked_Union and C_Pass_by_Copy are documented in the "Tour of 
ObjectAda" document in the section on interfacing to other languages.

- Ed