From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8147e9052e4bc0df X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Vadim Godunko Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: -gnatN breakage was: Child vs nested package : efficiency matter Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <11039f0d-ee37-4c99-ad4b-ab2ed658d553@m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> References: <37b699c4-da76-4b5f-9074-0aa465af4a19@v12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.165.127.223 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275489590 17976 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2010 14:39:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=109.165.127.223; posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.5.9-0.1.1 Firefox/3.5.9,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12201 Date: 2010-06-02T07:39:49-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 2, 3:11=A0pm, "Alex R. Mosteo" wrote: > > I've played with -gnatn and -gnatN in the past, and found that the latter > tends to bomb the compiler quite a lot. (GPL2008 and 2009 experiences). > Anyone seeing the same? -gnatN is obsolete, you must use pragma Inline/Inline_Always with - gnatn instead.